Generative art ideas and source code.      By zenbullets.
Generative Art Is Not … New

Generative art has a history measured in decades, not long compared to other arts, which is probably why it is still on the periphery of the art world. While Art Colleges across the globe are churning out tens of thousands of painters, potters, fashion designers and graphic designers every year, the number of practising Generative Artists in the world at present could probably fit quite comfortably onto a single Caribbean cruise liner. Which would be a lovely idea if anyone fancies arranging it.

This demographic is changing fast though. As popular computing technology accelerates, more creative people are getting theirs hands on the tools and discovering this novel art form.


While the term Generative Art has only really been in general use since the 1960s, the concept has been with us a lot longer. Generative forms of music, for example, have been around since Mozart. His Musikalisches Würfelspiel (Musical Dice Game) was an early example of a generative artistic system. The idea was to create a Minuet by cutting and pasting together pre-written sections, making selections according to the roll of a dice. Even with a single six sided dice, the number of possible combinations rises very quickly, e.g. by five rolls there are 7,776 possible combinations, with six rolls 46,656. These types of artistic parlour games became very popular in the 18th Century.

In the last century composers such as John Cage, Karlheinz Stockhausen, and Brian Eno expanded upon the idea of generative music. John Cage’s 4’ 33”, his controversial note-less piece defined only by it’s length, takes environmental ambient sounds as it’s only content, meaning no two performances of the work are ever the same. Later, Stockhausen and Eno (and others) experimented with procedural methods of composition, where music is defined by a set of rules or conditions. Eno’s Discreet Music LP (1975) is a fine example of this, the first side of which is a 30-minute piece created by a tape loop feedback system. A synthesised melody was recorded onto a tape machine, the output of which was fed into a second tape machine. The output of the second machine was then fed back into the first machine and the overlapping signals recorded. We know of this process because Eno included a diagram of his setup on the back cover of the LP.

Brian Eno's Discreet Music diagram

Visual forms of Generative Art started emerging in the 1960s, firstly with computers outputting to plotters, then VDUs, and later more sophisticated forms of print and video. An early pioneer in this area was the artist Manfred Mohr, who published a collection of computer-generated artworks Artificiata I in 1969.


But while the development of GenArt has been closely tied to the evolution of the computer, computers are just a useful convenience. The real tools of GenArt, the underlying constants to the various tools we can use, are the algorithms. Algorithms are a part of the natural world; they have a universality that transcends medium. So while the systems capable of creating GenArt change over time, evolving as technology evolves, the algorithms remain the same. Generative Art may not quite as old as Art itself, but it might be said to be at least as old as mathematics.

5 Responses to “Generative Art Is Not … New”
  • Richard Willis Says:

    I went to the V & A to see the Decode exhibition at the weekend. I thought it was an excellent place to hold an exhibition of digital art as it contained hordes of similarly generative art from the past. Before entering, I stopped off at the Persian galleries to take in the rugs, particularly the Ardabil Carpet:


    I thought it’d make for a great comparison before going in. Sadly I spent so much time idling over the rugs that the tickets sold out before I had a chance to buy one. But def. a lot of scope for future comparison, I shall there return one day soon.

  • DieTapete Says:

    The V&A seems to hide the information that they run another exhibition quite similar to decode: Digital Pioneers. I stumbled across it totally by chance, when i was wandering through the museum afterwards. Suddenly there were all the old masters: Laposky, Nees, Nake, Franke, Csuri, Cohan,…!!
    Just impressive!

  • Nipperkin Says:

    Interesting that you consider Cage’s 4’33” a work of generative music; I never would have thought of it that way. I mean, there’s no process being set in motion with an eye to generating results, apart from hushed listening in anticipation of something (music) happening, which of course it always already is. Taking this argument to an extreme, I suppose we could say that life is generative art, in that it is always resulting in new, unscripted results. To come back to Cage, this idea is aligned with his desire to “imitate nature in her manner of operation” in his work.

    Thanks for the thought.

  • Bardia Khosravi Says:

    Great work I see here. Congratulations. I am also reading the book that I bought from amazon. Please checkout some of my generative art work. I call it AEVA – An Evolutionary Art Generator as my philosophy is based on principles of evolution.

  • Bardia Khosravi Says:


Add your comment

"Art is never finished, only abandoned."
- Leonardo da Vinci


June 2013 (9)
May 2013 (11)
April 2013 (9)
December 2010 (4)
November 2010 (5)
October 2010 (1)
September 2010 (10)
August 2010 (9)
July 2010 (6)
June 2010 (5)
February 2010 (2)
January 2010 (3)
December 2009 (3)
November 2009 (3)
October 2009 (5)
September 2009 (1)
August 2009 (4)
May 2009 (5)
April 2009 (6)
March 2009 (4)
February 2009 (7)
January 2009 (9)
December 2008 (11)
November 2008 (4)
October 2008 (5)
September 2008 (1)

Creative Commons License

Generative Art Book